Celebrities And Scientology — What’s The Draw?

If I was able to that quickly assess and reject Scientology as a fourteen-year old, then why are dozens of celebrities willing to donate hundreds of thousands if not millions of dollars just to move through the levels of a religion invented by a science-fiction writer? Well I have some theories about that, so let’s talk.

In reading a 2011 article on Scientology from The New Yorker, I came across this quote from Hugh B. Urban, who teaches religious studies at Ohio State University:

“I think the reason that celebrities would be interested is because it’s a religion that fits pretty well with a celebrity kind of personality. It’s very individualistic. It celebrates your individual identity as ultimately divine. It claims to give you ultimate power over your own mind, self, destiny, so I think it fits well with an actor personality. And then the wealth question: These aren’t people who need more wealth, but what they do need, or often want at least, is some kind of spiritual validation for their wealth and lifestyle, and Scientology is a religion that says it’s OK to be wealthy, it’s OK to be famous, in fact, that’s a sign of your spiritual development. So it kind of is a spiritual validation for that kind of lifestyle.”

Whereas many religions preach that the less you have in this lifetime, the more you deserve in the next, Scientology encourages its followers to achieve what they can, as their successes reflect back on the Church and make them more able to contribute financially. The Scientology Celebrity Centres are gaudy properties where theoretically anyone can worship, but with special entrances, VIP lounges, and separate ‘auditing facilities’ for famous adherents. In addition, Scientology seems almost specifically designed to appeal to actors, as its teachings purportedly give them control over their lives in a world where they’re really quite helpless. If you want a job, you have to audition for it, sometimes multiple times, alongside people exactly like you. You can feel that you had the best audition and not get the part, or the worst audition and get cast the next day. It’s a system with no control, where you rely on the whims of casting directors, producers, agents, etcetera, and it can become incredibly frustrating over time.

Which is where Scientology steps in. It offers a range of courses insisting they can maximize your potential, increase your intelligence, streamline your talent, and most importantly — give you control of your life. The trick of the religion is in its ability to catch people at the right time, right as they’re becoming famous, when all they need to really break through is an attitude shift, and then they’re suddenly wildly successful. The Church then capitalizes on that moment, saying that your success came about from Scientology, conveniently helping you forget all the many years of hard work, fruitless auditions, and unpaid bills.

The thing is, this technique is really genius, actually, because of the environment that’s fostered by actors working on a project. When you’re working on a show or a film, you know you’re not actually that character, but you have to suspend your disbelief to accurately portray them. You have to really open up your mind to take in new information and take on false characteristics, and in that mindset, you’re extremely susceptible to outside ideas. That’s part of why it happens so often that people have relationships with their former co-stars — you’re engaged in something intensely personal that people outside the project couldn’t understand. It’s the perfect breeding ground for a cult, and I’m honestly surprised that no one’s thought of it before L. Ron Hubbard.

I don’t want to make a blanket statement, but I’m about to. The most successful actors are typically extremely narcissistic. (Surprise!) And it makes sense. It’s so difficult to become a successful actor, let alone a movie star, that you have to have intense faith in yourself, almost to the point of irrationality. People every day for years and years will tell you ‘no’, and you have to continue to believe ‘yes’. That is completely and totally crazy. You don’t want to hang out with people like that. Those are the people who when you say, “What’s your back-up plan?” they say, “I don’t need one, I’m going to be famous and people will give me money to be more famous!” And a surprising number of cases, they’re actually right, because people who really want and believe that are going to make it happen. They are, in a word, obsessed. Think about the ridiculous things you see in the riders of famous people. They want all their M&Ms sorted so they don’t even have to TOUCH the flavors they don’t like. They want eight dozen roses in each dressing room. They want ten phone lines. That is ridiculous. No one needs all that.

But Scientology supports that kind of behavior. It encourages its members to be elitists. It seeks out egotists — people who think they’re better than us because they have proof! As a nation, we pay millions of dollars every year to watch them on movie screens. We adore them, and they begin to feel they deserve more and more adoration, which the Church heaps on so that they’ll continue to disseminate Scientology’s messages.

And even if people do become disillusioned with the religion, after a while you’ve invested too much time and money to just stop. It’s like when you’re waiting for the subway and it’s been thirty minutes — you should leave, but because you’ve already put so much time into waiting, you find yourself waiting five more minutes, and then another five, and then another five…

And hours and hours after the rest of us have sucked it up and taken a cab home, Tom Cruise will still be waiting on that platform for the G.

(Image: WENN.com)

Share This Post:
    • Georgie

      Fucking interesting post. Key Quote:

      “If I was able to that quickly assess and reject Scientology as a fourteen-year old, then why are dozens of celebrities willing to donate hundreds of thousands if not millions of dollars just to move through the levels of a religion invented by a science-fiction writer?”

      • Alexis Rhiannon

        Thanks so much!

      • Maddon

        The answer lies within their belief that they are going to achieve super powers over other people, it is their selfishness and greed that motivates them.

    • Pennie

      Totally agree with your points. I’ve always thought the same. Makes total sense, non?

      • Alexis Rhiannon

        Thanks, I think so!

    • Pingback: Flavorwire » What’s On at Flavorpill: The Links That Made the Rounds in Our Office()

    • Lola Martinez

      This was really enlightening. Where as in Christianity less is more, in Scientology more is more. No wonder. Great post.

      • Alexis Rhiannon

        Thanks for reading!

    • johnalexwood

      I would like to take you up on your unsubstantiated claim that “Scientology supports that kind of behavior…”

      The truth is in fact the opposite. The moral code that Scientologists strive to follow, The Way To Happiness, encourages its members to “Honor and Help Your Parents (Precept 5); Try Not to Do Things to Others That You Would Not Like Them to Do to You (Precept 19); Try to Treat Others as You Would Want Them to Treat You (Precept 20). And Precept 21, by the way, is Flourish and Prosper. Remarkably, this article seems to take exception even to this! I don’t see how doing well in life (which is the message of Precept 21) is somehow wrong. So, being a liability on society is somehow right…?

      I would also like to add how the article makes no mention of the wonderful social betterment activities that the Church of Scientology carries out worldwide, namely: its youth drug education campaigns via Drug Free World and Say No To Drugs; its human rights education campaigns via Youth For Human Rights; its highly successful drug rehabs called Narconon; the effective work it does in prisons to reduce crime, particularly recidivism, the revolving door of crime, via Criminon; its free literacy campaigns helping people read and write; and its public awareness campaign concerning the dangers of psychiatric treatments, particularly the drugging of children with Ritalin and other ADHD medications. The campaign run by CCHR also highlights the fact that the side effects of some antidepressants include violent behaviour and suicide and it points out that nearly all the shooters in the notorious shooting massacre incidents were on (or were withdrawing from) such medication at the time of the shooting. Time will tell whether the recent Aurora shooting is yet another in this hall of shame. Innocent people are not safe while these drugs are being prescribed.

      • Adrienne

        The media attention on celebrity is the back lash the Church has to face for chasing these “stars” and promoting them in public to try to raise its profile, numbers and income. Unfortunately it has back fired dramatically.

        Scientology would/could have been more successful if it kepts its low profile and worked in the communities with it programs.

        Tom Cruise and the media attention he draws to his rants in interviews has generated so much negative attention to the Church. It has also drawn attention to the stories of people like Marty, Mike and Marc. Would I have read Blown for good, if I hadnt seen Toms interview with Matt L and his negative comments about Brooke Shields… I dont think so.

        How many books written by defecters in the 90′s got as much media attention as books written now? None because it wasn’t on the media hitlist. General people weren’t interested. Tom and Kristie have made people interested, but it is all negative. Chart the number of followers in the Church over the years and you will probably see a direct correlation between the declining memberships and the increase in media/celebrity focus.

      • kirbyjay

        The reason that these people shoot up schools and public places is because they are mentally ill and are either not on the proper medication, stop taking it, or are just to far gone to be successfully treated. I agree that many kids are being unnecessarily prescribed ADHD drugs when the solution would be proper diet and parenting, but to claim that all anti-depressants are bad is just ignorant. I had depression and anxiety so severe 15 years ago that I was borderline suicidal. I was prescribed an anti-depressant, not a barbiturate like Xanax, but an actual SRI that balances your chemicals but does not alter mood. Within a week I felt absolutely normal again and have ever since. They saved my life and I deeply resent the misinformation that Scientology doles out about “violent” behavior and suicidal thoughts.
        L.Ron Hubbard detested psychiatry because it interferes with his “auditing” process which is a form of repetitive brainwashing.
        Let me ask you this, Co$ member. Why does every person that leaves Scientology say the exact same thing? Disassociation from friends and family members, Sea Org labor camps, harassment from high echelon management, etc….

    • Arun

      Really interesting and makes sense once you start put the dots together. Religion is religion. Cult is cult. Scientology the “religion” where you pay for enlightenment.

    • Pingback: Philip Seymour Hoffman and the Historical Triumph and Tragedy of American Movies | That Devil History()

    • Pingback: A List Of Celebrities You'll Be Surprised Are Scientologists()